DNA-based Verification Presents a Scientifically Proven Assurance Perspective for Animal Welfare

In food systems built on trust, assurance has traditionally relied on documentation. Audit trails, certificates, declarations and inspections have long been the backbone of compliance. They remain essential. As supply chains become more complex and societal expectations rise, documentation alone is increasingly strained under pressure.

This is true for animal welfare. As Susanne Maassen, the CEO of the Foundation Better Life Label (Stichting Beter Leven Keurmerk), described during a panel discussion at GFSI 2026, animal welfare is not just a technical specification to be verified at a moment in time; it is an ethical promise embedded in the product itself.

That distinction matters. When welfare claims fail, the consequences extend beyond regulatory non-compliance into public trust, farmer investment and the credibility of entire animal welfare concepts.

Across Europe, retailers and assurance schemes are grappling with a shared question: How do you prove that welfare standards hold, not only when everything is aligned, but also when incentives, scale and operational pressure challenge the system?

DNA SnapShot – the biological truth

Scientific DNA-based verification introduces a fundamentally different assurance perspective. Instead of asking whether documentation is correct, it asks whether the product itself confirms the claim. Biology does not respond to paperwork. DNA cannot be retrospectively aligned, corrected or reinterpreted.

The DNA TraceBack® one-time verification approach exemplifies this shift. Rather than replacing existing audits, it provides a single, evidence-based assessment directly on the product, using scientific analysis instead of process descriptions. In practical terms, this allows organizations to test whether declared attributes—such as breed type linked to welfare standards—are genuinely present in market-ready products.

This distinction is critical. A one-time DNA verification does not claim to show everything. What it does is cut through complexity and reveal whether the system performs as intended at a specific point, under real commercial conditions.

Why welfare claims demand higher assurance

Animal welfare standards require farmers to invest financially, operationally and culturally. Slow-growing breeds, lower stocking densities, longer production cycles and enriched environments all come at a cost. If those investments are not adequately protected, the system becomes vulnerable to dilution and unfair competition.

From a governance perspective, this creates a responsibility for assurance bodies: protecting the integrity of the concept also means protecting the farmers who comply. As Susanne described, transparency is not a marketing tool. It’s a way to protect fairness, trust and the long-term stability of the system.

At the same time, consumers must be able to trust that the ethical claims they pay for genuinely apply to the product in their shopping basket.

This is where DNA verification begins to add value beyond compliance. It strengthens confidence that the biological reality matches the ethical narrative.

Learning from first insights

During the panel discussion, Susanne described how DNA-based snapshot testing was first applied in a poultry supply chain. Retail products were analyzed for presence of fast-growing breeds that are not eligible under the scheme’s welfare standard.

The insight was not theoretical. It was science based, practical and confronting. The results demonstrated that even in well-defined supply chains, deviations can occur that are invisible to paperwork alone.

What followed was not punitive, but a more integrated approach. Snapshot testing evolved into a regular monthly monitoring program. Deviations triggered further investigation, including supply chain analysis and, where necessary, additional financial and data checks by independent specialists. DNA did not replace audits; it strengthened them, acting as an additional verification layer that increased the resilience of the assurance system.

From resilience to value

Transparency, in this context, is not about exposure, it is about protection. Protecting the credibility of welfare concepts. Protecting compliant partners. Protecting long-term trust.

The real value of DNA verification lies in its ability to anchor ethical claims in biological evidence. It allows assurance systems to move from assumption to confirmation, from periodic compliance to ongoing confidence.

As food systems continue to evolve, assurance models must evolve with them. DNA does not solve every challenge. However, it changes the question, from “Does the paperwork say it’s compliant?” to “Does the product prove it.”

DNA TraceBack® is a product of MSD Animal Health. For more information, please visit www.IdentiGEN.com

Copyright © 2026 Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA and its affiliates. All rights reserved.